[picocontainer-dev] RE: [picocontainer-scm] [scm-git][2/2] make some more things optional -- are shaded into the jar

[Michael Rimov]

Paul,



Silly question, but since these are shaded, don’t we want to mark them as <scope>provided</scope> instead?



-Mike







From: Paul Hammant [mailto:git-yCVjj/***@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:46 PM
To: scm-qxt/k92ZUMzOYGyH7mwfjrEhcVWVsK+***@public.gmane.org
Subject: [picocontainer-scm] [scm-git][2/2] make some more things optional -- are shaded into the jar



Commit

93000234440033d12ad2bf1a83332055a65a9468

Branch

master

Author

Paul Hammant <paul-POq8DFUn+***@public.gmane.org>

Date

Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:44:51 -0500

Message

make some more things optional -- are shaded into the jar


Changed file pico/container-debug/pom.xml


24

24

</dependency>


25

25

<dependency>


26

26

<groupId>com.googlecode.jtype</groupId><artifactId>jtype</artifactId><version>0.1.1</version>


27

<optional>true</optional>


27

28

</dependency>


28

29

<dependency>


29

30

<groupId>org.mockito</groupId><artifactId>mockito-core</artifactId>


Changed file pico/container/pom.xml


10

10

<dependencies>


11

11

<dependency>


12

12

<groupId>com.thoughtworks.paranamer</groupId><artifactId>paranamer</artifactId><version>${paranamer-version}</version>


13

<optional>true</optional>


13

14

</dependency>


14

15

<dependency>


15

16

<groupId>javax.inject</groupId><artifactId>javax.inject</artifactId><version>1</version>